================
Vendoring Policy
================
* Vendored libraries **MUST** not be modified except as required to
successfully vendor them.
* Vendored libraries **MUST** be released copies of libraries available on
PyPI.
* Vendored libraries **MUST** be available under a license that allows
them to be integrated into ``pip``, which is released under the MIT license.
* Vendored libraries **MUST** be accompanied with LICENSE files.
* The versions of libraries vendored in pip **MUST** be reflected in
``pip/_vendor/vendor.txt``.
* Vendored libraries **MUST** function without any build steps such as ``2to3``
or compilation of C code, practically this limits to single source 2.x/3.x and
pure Python.
* Any modifications made to libraries **MUST** be noted in
``pip/_vendor/README.rst`` and their corresponding patches **MUST** be
included ``tools/vendoring/patches``.
* Vendored libraries should have corresponding ``vendored()`` entries in
``pip/_vendor/__init__.py``.
Rationale
=========
Historically pip has not had any dependencies except for ``setuptools`` itself,
choosing instead to implement any functionality it needed to prevent needing
a dependency. However, starting with pip 1.5, we began to replace code that was
implemented inside of pip with reusable libraries from PyPI. This brought the
typical benefits of reusing libraries instead of reinventing the wheel like
higher quality and more battle tested code, centralization of bug fixes
(particularly security sensitive ones), and better/more features for less work.
However, there are several issues with having dependencies in the traditional
way (via ``install_requires``) for pip. These issues are:
**Fragility**
When pip depends on another library to function then if for whatever reason
that library either isn't installed or an incompatible version is installed
then pip ceases to function. This is of course true for all Python
applications, however for every application *except* for pip the way you fix
it is by re-running pip. Obviously, when pip can't run, you can't use pip to
fix pip, so you're left having to manually resolve dependencies and
installing them by hand.
**Making other libraries uninstallable**
One of pip's current dependencies is the ``requests`` library, for which pip
requires a fairly recent version to run. If pip depended on ``requests`` in
the traditional manner, then we'd either have to maintain compatibility with
every ``requests`` version that has ever existed (and ever will), OR allow
pip to render certain versions of ``requests`` uninstallable. (The second
issue, although technically true for any Python application, is magnified by
pip's ubiquity; pip is installed by default in Python, in ``pyvenv``, and in
``virtualenv``.)
**Security**
This might seem puzzling at first glance, since vendoring has a tendency to
complicate updating dependencies for security updates, and that holds true
for pip. However, given the *other* reasons for avoiding dependencies, the
alternative is for pip to reinvent the wheel itself. This is what pip did
historically. It forced pip to re-implement its own HTTPS verification
routines as a workaround for the Python standard library's lack of SSL
validation, which resulted in similar bugs in the validation routine in
``requests`` and ``urllib3``, except that they had to be discovered and
fixed independently. Even though we're vendoring, reusing libraries keeps
pip more secure by relying on the great work of our dependencies, *and*
allowing for faster, easier security fixes by simply pulling in newer
versions of dependencies.
**Bootstrapping**
Currently most popular methods of installing pip rely on pip's
self-contained nature to install pip itself. These tools work by bundling a
copy of pip, adding it to ``sys.path``, and then executing that copy of pip.
This is done instead of implementing a "mini installer" (to reduce
duplication); pip already knows how to install a Python package, and is far
more battle-tested than any "mini installer" could ever possibly be.
Many downstream redistributors have policies against this kind of bundling, and
instead opt to patch the software they distribute to debundle it and make it
rely on the global versions of the software that they already have packaged
(which may have its own patches applied to it). We (the pip team) would prefer
it if pip was *not* debundled in this manner due to the above reasons and
instead we would prefer it if pip would be left intact as it is now.
In the longer term, if someone has a *portable* solution to the above problems,
other than the bundling method we currently use, that doesn't add additional
problems that are unreasonable then we would be happy to consider, and possibly
switch to said method. This solution must function correctly across all of the
situation that we expect pip to be used and not mandate some external mechanism
such as OS packages.
Modifications
=============
* ``setuptools`` is completely stripped to only keep ``pkg_resources``.
* ``pkg_resources`` has been modified to import its dependencies from
``pip._vendor``, and to use the vendored copy of ``platformdirs``
rather than ``appdirs``.
* ``packaging`` has been modified to import its dependencies from
``pip._vendor``.
* ``CacheControl`` has been modified to import its dependencies from
``pip._vendor``.
* ``requests`` has been modified to import its other dependencies from
``pip._vendor`` and to *not* load ``simplejson`` (all platforms) and
``pyopenssl`` (Windows).
* ``platformdirs`` has been modified to import its submodules from ``pip._vendor.platformdirs``.
Automatic Vendoring
===================
Vendoring is automated via the `vendoring